Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Note Records
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Black Kite (talk) 02:02, 10 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Note Records[edit]
- Note Records (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Original research, via [1] with no indication of notability that I can verify in reliable sources. Prior PROD, tag removed, time has passed, here we are. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © 14:41, 24 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:22, 24 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:30, 24 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:03, 31 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No records of note have been found. Har har har. Acebulf (talk) 08:38, 31 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Only independent source I can find is [some personal webpage]. Only citations that have existed was a telephone interview removed per WP:NOR (see history). Hasn't produced any musicians of notability. Fails WP:GNG. --Joshuaism (talk) 14:58, 9 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.