Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Notable socialites

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Definitely a BLP problem, no prejudice against creating a sourced version, but isn't really a start. --Leivick (talk) 23:09, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Notable socialites[edit]

A list based on a subjective term. Neutrality^talk 03:39, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Could be kept If it defined the term and included reliable sources for each person listed it would be acceptable and useful, seems to me. Redddogg (talk) 03:45, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Move to List of Notable Socialites. If each one has their own page, they are probably notable, and if they are not, they should be listed here; if the page contained no more links, then I would say delete. --Falcon Darkstar Kirtaran (talk) 04:28, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as is there are no sources and thus violates WP:BLP. However, it could be kept if it's moved to "List of Notable Socialites" and sourced. — Preceding unsigned comment added by CambridgeBayWeather (talk • contribs)

I agree. I didn't know about the "list of" article. Redddogg (talk) 12:44, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.