Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nostalgia Critic's The Wall

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 20:04, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nostalgia Critic's The Wall

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Funny article, and yes the video is terrible... however. There is nothing here that shows this is actually notable. No reliable sources are used in the article. IMDB, Amazon, RateYourMusic. And a search shows that none of them exist. There is also already a paragraph at Nostalgia Critic that covers everything here without the cruft, although it doesn't use any reliable sources either. So this can probably be deleted. --Quiz shows 19:33, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 21:03, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:42, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:42, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete As bad as it may be, it's surely not notable enough to have it's own standalone article. KingSkyLord (talk | contribs) 05:48, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: While the low rating on Rate Your Music and a negative review by Anthony Fantano have contributed to the notoriety of both the video and its associated album, barely any other reliable sources exist for the project to warrant its own article, not helped by the fact that most of the negative reactions are coming from Internet users rather than any actual critics. IceWalrus236 (talk) 02:16, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.