Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Northwest Washington Synod

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep - nomination withdrawn. I note that all the nominated articles have been redirected to List of ELCA synods, but any editor is free to revert those actiona, possibly to create articles on the regions. (non-admin closure). St Anselm (talk) 15:40, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Northwest Washington Synod

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP, while the ELCA itself is notable and there is some coverage of individuals associated with the synod, there is no in-depth coverage of the synod itself. ThadeusOfNazereth(he/they)^{Talk to Me!} 16:37, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn by nominator per discussion below. ThadeusOfNazereth(he/they)^{Talk to Me!} 22:56, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am also nominating the following related articles for deletion under the same rationale:

ThadeusOfNazereth(he/they)^{Talk to Me!} 17:02, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ThadeusOfNazereth(he/they)^{Talk to Me!} 17:08, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ThadeusOfNazereth(he/they)^{Talk to Me!} 17:26, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and Christianity. ThadeusOfNazereth(he/they)^{Talk to Me!} 16:37, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: no strong feeling either way. Perhaps they could be grouped together by region, i.e. Northwest & Southwest Washington, Oregon, Montana, and Eastern Washington-Idaho all under a "ELCA Region 1 Synods" -or not.Manannan67 (talk) 19:17, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
What would you think about redirecting all to List of ELCA synods and restructuring that page to include some of the basic information for each synod, like bishop and size? ThadeusOfNazereth(he/they)^{Talk to Me!} 19:47, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Procedural Keep. This many nominations at once overwhelms our ability to research them. Jahaza (talk) 20:12, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
If you'd like me to nominate each of them separately I'm happy to do that, but I feel that would be more disruptive than a single nomination given the issue is identical for each. ThadeusOfNazereth(he/they)^{Talk to Me!} 20:42, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Not if you nominate them over time. We've been dealing with this with footballers recently and it's generally been consensus not to nominate dozens at the same time, separately or altogether. Did you really do a before on all of these? And if you want to merge them, that doesn't require an AFD. --Jahaza (talk) 21:01, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I did a before on all of them before the nomination, but I didn't fully look at the bundling process which is why they came in a little staggered while I tried to figure out that workflow. I'll withdraw in a moment. ThadeusOfNazereth(he/they)^{Talk to Me!} 22:55, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. I can see no consensus above to merge all of them to List of ELCA synods. Given this AfD is still open, this should not have been done until a consensus was reached. -- Necrothesp (talk) 10:19, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.