Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Northwest Pipe Company

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Guerillero | My Talk 03:33, 22 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Northwest Pipe Company[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Restored prod, but I still dont see the notability. A routine pipe manufacturer, . If we were an industrial directory it would be an acceptable article, but we're an encyclopedia. DGG ( talk ) 06:58, 14 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:26, 15 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:26, 15 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Weak neutral, no objection to ~~either WP:SOFTDELETE or~~ a "no consensus" close allowing for a new AFD without waiting a long time. The dollar volume suggests that this company might be notable but unfortunately the article as written doesn't adequately demonstrate the company clearly meets WP:CORP or WP:GNG. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 00:05, 20 April 2014 (UTC) Updated: As a restored prod, a soft-delete is not appropriate. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 00:07, 20 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:29, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - appears to have enough independent sources. VMS Mosaic (talk) 04:41, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:26, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Routine press announcements and directory listings fall short of WP:CORPDEPTH and I am finding nothing better. AllyD (talk) 06:18, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached. I'm taking the unusual step of a third relist to invite the original creator of this article, @Blueena:, to comment. This user has created a number of similar articles. I'd like to hear from him or her what is significant about this group of companies. There may be something we're missing here.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- RoySmith (talk) 14:30, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as non notable company. →Davey2010→→Talk to me!→ 16:08, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.