Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Northwest Model United Nations
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. — OcatecirT 16:53, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Northwest Model United Nations (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Non-notable student organization under the Model United Nations umbrella. --Dynaflow babble 05:10, 22 June 2007 (UTC)}}[reply]
- Delete. If a source is found that supports the claim that it's "the largest university-level Model United Nations conference in the northwestern United States" I may review my decision.--ZayZayEM 05:40, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Washington-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 12:16, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, I think. There are over 400 Model UN conferences, I don't think any of them have a wikipedia page. Might be okay to list them on the main Model UN page, but doubtful there is much use in having a page for each of them. Unless I am wrong -- if there are a bunch of conferences with pages, then maybe they are notable in their own right. Capmango 23:03, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge with the parent article as it is not nn but info can be integrated with Model United Nations.--JForget 23:05, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I thought it might just pass, but suggested it be brought it here to see what others think. DGG 00:50, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Two examples of conferences with their own wikipedia pages are NMUN and THIMUN. There are many others as well; these are just a couple of examples. Each conference is notable in its own right, as there are a lot of differences between them and a line on a "list of" type page won't really help distinguish them. 71.193.255.114 22:32, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment See WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS. Just because other Model UNs have an article doesn't mean that this one deserves one. It has to meet the guidelines for notability, which this group doesn't. And if those model UNs don't meet the notability requirements, those too will eventually be nominated for deletion. But I digress; unless you have reliable sources that show that this Model UN is notable, you might have a better chance of keeping this article. NeoChaosX (talk, walk) 03:08, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I wasn't justifying it on that grounds, I was responding to the claim by Capmango that the others don't exist on wikipedia. I also don't think that it's necessarily relevant, but that's a separate issue. Regarding notability, there is one source listed already, and I found another one the other day that I have to find again and put up there. 71.193.255.114 00:41, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment See WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS. Just because other Model UNs have an article doesn't mean that this one deserves one. It has to meet the guidelines for notability, which this group doesn't. And if those model UNs don't meet the notability requirements, those too will eventually be nominated for deletion. But I digress; unless you have reliable sources that show that this Model UN is notable, you might have a better chance of keeping this article. NeoChaosX (talk, walk) 03:08, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.