Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/North Carolina Technology Student Association
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Singularity 17:55, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- North Carolina Technology Student Association (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
This was PRODed and restored at DRV so now we're here. RS coverage is trivial and per WP:ORG, individual chapters of local orgs are rarely notable. No evidence this is an exception. I do not think this should be a merge since the main article does not cover individual chapters, nor should it. TRAVELLINGCARIMy storyTell me yours 18:08, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:ORG: "Individual chapters of national and international organizations are usually not notable enough to warrant a separate article unless sufficient notability is established through reliable sources." Deor (talk) 18:21, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - this is an easy one. Delete it.--SevernSevern (talk) 21:41, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 13:56, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 13:56, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of North Carolina-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 13:56, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per SevernSevern. Doesn't meet WP:ORG. Stifle (talk) 20:52, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - local chapters of national bodies need to separately meet WP:ORG and this one doesn't, at least at present. TerriersFan (talk) 22:47, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom and TerriersFan. CRGreathouse (t | c) 01:53, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.