Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/North Canberra Gungahlin Cricket Club
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:54, 20 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
North Canberra Gungahlin Cricket Club[edit]
- North Canberra Gungahlin Cricket Club (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Grade cricket club in the ACT. I'm unable to find anything in gnews that could come close to the significant coverage that's required to pass WP:GNG. The reason I've taken this to AfD instead of just PRODing is because an argument could be made that, as a grade cricket team, they technically meet WP:CRIN. However, my understanding is that the level of play and coverage for ACT grade cricket is far below that of the other Australian states – indeed, the ACT competition is not listed at the grade cricket article and there does not appear to be an article on the grade cricket competition in the ACT. Jenks24 (talk) 08:23, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. —Jenks24 (talk) 08:26, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. Jenks24 (talk) 08:26, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Steven Zhang The clock is ticking.... 00:37, 14 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above S.G.(GH) ping! 17:20, 14 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete non-notable local cricket club Nick-D (talk) 10:08, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.