Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/North America Challenge
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete, per author nominating his own articles? Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 15:44, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- North America Challenge (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Non-notable events, the article was created from information I removed from the article Laser Quest. After some contemplation and looking at what I could find the event doesnt appear(google news search) to warrant separate detailed article. Gnangarra 11:18, 4 June 2008 (UTC) I am also nominating the following related pages for the same reason:[reply]
- North America Challenge 2007 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- North America Challenge 2006 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
I have also placed a notice at Talk:Laser Quest#AFD notice as the content was originally removed from Laser Quest Gnangarra 11:18, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy DeleteMergeas the nom is also the author. Put any relevant information that the Laser Quest requires back and lose the rest. Jasynnash2 (talk) 12:18, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- While the speedy criteria can be applied, as an admin I could just delete the articles. I cant claim it as being information I authored or sole editor of the article, its info I had just removed from the article, and think that editors who have acted in good faith in adding the info to Laser Quest should have the opportunity to respond. Gnangarra 12:23, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Can't you put the information back in Laser Quest then? Surely, this is about deleting the article you created, otherwise isn't it just a case of merging back into the original article and discussing on the Laser Quest talkpage? Jasynnash2 (talk) 13:28, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The article I created is only one of the nominated articles. Gnangarra 14:09, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Sorry I misunderstood then. Jasynnash2 (talk) 14:15, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The article I created is only one of the nominated articles. Gnangarra 14:09, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Can't you put the information back in Laser Quest then? Surely, this is about deleting the article you created, otherwise isn't it just a case of merging back into the original article and discussing on the Laser Quest talkpage? Jasynnash2 (talk) 13:28, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- While the speedy criteria can be applied, as an admin I could just delete the articles. I cant claim it as being information I authored or sole editor of the article, its info I had just removed from the article, and think that editors who have acted in good faith in adding the info to Laser Quest should have the opportunity to respond. Gnangarra 12:23, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
If verifiability is a problem, this may help. --CptNimrod (talk) 04:17, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- that verifies but its a primary source, as such it doesnt assert notability which requires significant coverage in independent sources. Gnangarra 00:27, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:55, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge - Not referenced, hardly notable, should merge. Limetolime Talk to me • look what I did! 14:23, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and no redirect – All. This information is already included on the Laser Quest page, as it should be. Individual articles about the NAC could almost be construed as SPAM in that they hold no other function than to advertise Laser Quest. ShoesssS Talk 17:24, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Game-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 17:27, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.