Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Norman Breslow

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy keep, sock nom. (non-admin closure) Natureium (talk) 14:11, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Norman Breslow

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.

Non-notable American statistician and medical researcher. Inightfox (talk) 03:02, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete no evidence of notability. \\\Septrillion:- ~~‭~~10^Eleventeen 03:08, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment article does not appear to have been WP:PRODed at any point. Nominatior probably should have tried that first. \\\Septrillion:- ~~‭~~10^Eleventeen 06:07, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. Nominator has been blocked as a sock puppet. Block evasion confirmed at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Donnie Park. • Gene93k (talk) 11:39, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. ^{cinco de}L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 12:10, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. ^{cinco de}L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 12:10, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. ^{cinco de}L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 12:10, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep/Speedy close. Top cited GScholar hits of 14501, 7978, 4456, h-index of around 80+, several published obituaries, including in Los Angeles Times and in Seattle Times, more than enough here to pass both WP:BIO and WP:PROF. Not sure what was the deal with this nomination but it is difficult to view it as a good faith nom. Suggest a speedy close. Nsk92 (talk) 12:54, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Hhkohh (talk) 13:10, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions. Hhkohh (talk) 13:10, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Minnesota-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 13:12, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Snow keep "Key figure in the foundation of modern biostatistics." [1] One of the most egregious failures of WP:BEFORE, and most blatant and convincing passes of WP:PROF, I've ever seen at AFD. Everymorning talk to me 13:37, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.