Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Noreen Khan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Daniel J. Leivick (talk) 07:22, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Noreen Khan[edit]

Subject does not appear to be notable per WP:N or WP:BIO. The article's only reference is to a specialized publication and, by itself, doesn't seem to me to establish notability. A good faith (if far from exhaustive) effort to find additional references was not successful. There are plenty of ghits but none of them appears to meet WP:RS except the single reference already present on the page which is also the only Google news hit that appears to actually be about this person. There are others but they all seem to be about other people of the same name. The single reference just doesn't make the grade in my book. Note that this article was created by a single purpose account called NOREEN222 strongly suggesting a COI is at work here. OlenWhitaker • ^{talk to me} or _don't • ♣ ♥ ♠ ♦ 00:05, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:BLP. This guy doesn't even have a web page! :-) As for the SPA: its truly pathetic when someone writing about himself is unable to contribute anything reasonably biographical about himself -- not even the basics, like date of birth, leave alone anything reasonably substantive. Bah. -- Fullstop (talk) 00:54, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. This guy? Did you actually read the article or look at the reference? And here's ~~his~~ her home page. Phil Bridger (talk) 08:53, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per above --Lemmey talk 04:36, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
Delete - no indication of notability and article fails to establish notability, nor does the source really help establish notability. Titanium Dragon (talk) 07:17, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as the verified presenter of a regular weekly show on national radio. Here are a couple more sources: [1] [2]. Phil Bridger (talk) 08:53, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, a once weekly radio DJ is not encyclopedic material unless there is some broader reason for being notable that is the subject of widespread (not merely incidental) coverage in WP:RS. KleenupKrew (talk) 11:40, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. —Hiding T 15:49, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.