Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nordreich

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. No consensus to delete, default to keep. (non-admin closure) NonvocalScream (talk) 03:16, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nordreich[edit]

This article, and the online organization it describes, lacks 'real-world' notability and relevance. It's only defence is a short burst of news reports about the organization in question, which Wikipedia guidelines (WP:NOTE) explicitly state that is not sufficient evidence of notability. The organization in question remains to be irrelevant to anyone outside the Internet community in which it operates. CarlosPatiño (talk) 15:54, 30 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Weak merge into one or all of Cyber Nations, YouTube, and Minister of Foreign Affairs (Norway). There is a mention of them in UPI NewsTrack and Cyber Nations. I doubt that the creators of Cyber Nations online game thought someone would choose Nazi's as a basis for their fictional nation and this is an interesting topic. However, the information seems to be about the reactions to Nordreich rather than a chronological account of the series of events making up the "life" of the Nordreich organization. The point of the fictional orginazation was to participate in Cyber Nations and the Wikipedia article on Nordreich lacks details on their participation in Cyber Nations. While everyone reacted to Nordreich, the Nordreich organization itself did not do much that could be detailed in an article about Nordreich. The news coverage of Nordreich doesn't seem to go beyond the context of a single event. There might be some source material in German. Suntag (talk) 16:21, 30 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merge somehwere WikiScrubber (talk) 09:21, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Game-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 23:59, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep or (better yet) Merge somewhere. There is enough reporting on this to make it notable per WP:N. Even ignoring that, it's notable in the English sense of the word. But editorially I think it should be part of something larger, not an article by itself. Hobit (talk) 02:22, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.