Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nordisk Vision

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 22:55, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nordisk Vision[edit]

Nordisk Vision (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There does not seem to be much media coverage on this topic. There are only 394 likes on the Facebook page of this NGO.ilmaisin (talk) 19:17, 31 August 2020 (UTC) Struck over link to a Facebook page of a completely different thing. --ilmaisin (talk) 10:06, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It seems to me that the sources listed in the article are reliable by themselves, but are not about this NGO. --ilmaisin (talk) 19:25, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. - hako9 (talk) 19:50, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Denmark-related deletion discussions. - hako9 (talk) 19:50, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finland-related deletion discussions. - hako9 (talk) 19:50, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Norway-related deletion discussions. - hako9 (talk) 19:50, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. - hako9 (talk) 19:50, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete I have tried, but failed, to find any reliable sources on the topic. Furthermore, the organisation seems to be defunct now. (Note also that the above linked Facebook page appears to about a summer camp hosted by the Party of the Swedes, not this organisation.) ― Hebsen (talk) 21:25, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    I struck over that link. --ilmaisin (talk) 10:28, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment Facebook page likes do not determine notability. BLDM (talk) 01:49, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    I know, but it may give a rough estimate on whether or not it is a big NGO. That neither is same thing as notability, but it is one thing that affects notability. --ilmaisin (talk) 10:06, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • This almost looks like a some kind of hoax article. While the website of the organization used to exist, at least not all of the per-country organizations were real: the Finnish Business Information System finds no organizations—active or defunct—named "Pohjoismainen Visio". --ilmaisin (talk) 10:28, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    • No, it was real, but apparently just a minor fringe organization that never really managed to do anything. It can be found in the Danish corporation database [1], and old material from it can be found on some fringe websites [2][3][4]. Neither make it notable, thought. ― Hebsen (talk) 13:13, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Not sure if any of the sources actually mention this NGO. The article seems mostly be an essay arguing for their vision based these sources. No evidence that this NGO, if it's even operational anymore, is notable. --Pudeo (talk) 19:17, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delele unable to fulfill the requirements of WP:NORG Graywalls (talk) 13:38, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.