Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nordica destinations (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 13:16, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nordica destinations

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article is was supported by only a single primary WP:SELFSOURCE. A third-party was removed. According to WP:PSTS, "Secondary or tertiary sources are needed to establish the topic's notability." The text could be merged into the main article. This standalone article fails WP:OR. I am sympathetic to the idea that the subject's website is likely to be accurate, but this article fails. ~~A WP:BEFORE search for secondary sources turns up nothing useful.~~The article is now referenced Rhadow (talk) 11:42, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: ~~@Rhadow: You need to fix the AfD template above.~~ Anyway, originally this table was part of the Nordica, but it was split by user KAL Crew. -- intgr [talk] 14:56, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have no idea how I broke it. My first attempt only made it worse. Sorry. Rhadow (talk) 15:37, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Rhadow: Fixed it. You were missing a ] at [[WP:BEFORE]. -- intgr [talk] 20:09, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Keep I have added 13 secondary sources and hope to finish referencing the remaining destinations soon, making this AfD moot. SportingFlyer (talk) 22:19, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have finished referencing all but one destination. SportingFlyer (talk) 03:42, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 06:51, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 06:51, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 06:51, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Estonia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 06:51, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Keep Plenty of secondary sources have been added. Please stop with these nominations. The issue has been resolved. These articles are notable. If this abuse continues, we may have to escalate to WP:ANI. Smartyllama (talk) 17:48, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment -- I agree that this article is now sufficiently referenced. I stand by my assertion that unreferenced articles are inappropriate for an encyclopedia. This discussion has led to the examination of other weak articles such as Flybe franchise and codeshare destinations, Holidays Czech Airlines destinations, and Skyservice destinations. I am not sure that continuing this discussion at ANI will add much to the debate. You are free to take it there, though. Rhadow (talk) 13:17, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Now referenced and Nordica is an airline with regular services, so this article is well under the scope of airline destination lists. According to a recent DRV discussin there are no reasons for not to have these articles.--Jetstreamer ^Talk 18:35, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.