Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nonpositive data

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 17:31, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nonpositive data[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No references to indicate that this is a common, or at least notable, definition in the database world. A GScholar search for "nonpositive database" didn't turn up any results either. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 11:14, 15 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:42, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SarahStierch (talk) 01:57, 23 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I'm no database expert but this article looks utter baloney to me. Since its creation in 2006 every edit has been merely clerical or administrative in nature. There are no substantive links to the article and it has no references. I can think of nowhere it could (let alone should) be redirected to. Thincat (talk) 15:18, 23 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete probably more like a neologism a researcher coined for a thesis or somesuch. Never caught on. W Nowicki (talk) 18:08, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.