Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nokua design

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 10:06, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nokua design[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article was copied to mainspace immediately after being declined at WP:AFC for having no independent reliable sources. I was unable to find any news reports, book references, product reviews, etc., to add to the article. —Anne Delong (talk) 14:26, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. I've also found no secondary sources just as the nominator indicated. --Non-Dropframe _talk 14:32, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Malaysia-related deletion discussions. Human3015^TALK 15:01, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Human3015^TALK 15:01, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Human3015^TALK 15:01, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. Human3015^TALK 15:02, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nominator. NewYorkActuary (talk) 18:38, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete by AfD to ensure there is a consensus verdict rather than use CSD. Nominator says it all. Fails WP:CORP. Created by now blocked COI editor, so consider the unusual step of an early Salt. Fiddle Faddle 11:33, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per nom and above editors. Searches did not return anything to show they pass either WP:GNG or WP:NCORP. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 21:19, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.