Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Noize Generation

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Davewild (talk) 20:09, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Noize Generation

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Prodded by User:WikiDan61 under: "= Insufficient evidence of notability. No major chart positions, no national airplay, etc." Deprodded by User:Staszek Lem "Poor article, but there is independent coverage in news IMO enough for WP:MUSIC". I agree with WikiDan that the coverage (references, external links, etc.) I see does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (biographies) requirement. Please present better sources here and add them to the article if anyone can find some. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 10:30, 15 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep - My German is not good, but seems that NoGen gained media coverage related to Austria selection of Eurovision [1]. If someone who can read Deutsch verifies this, then the notability is sufficient.Staszek Lem (talk) 16:35, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:03, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:03, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep. I found quite a bit of German-language coverage but most related to his part in the contest to find Germany's Eurovision entry. Appears to have done quite a bit outside the competition though. --Michig (talk) 09:35, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nakon 01:32, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.