Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Noise Party
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete --Celestianpower hablamé 15:24, 17 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions. -- Cyberjunkie | Talk 13:39, 11 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Don't Delete This band is extremely alternative and thus, has not been heard of by many people. They have not signed to a record label and keep to themselves, but they do exist, meet and perform.
bandvanity
- Delete Gazpacho 01:01, 11 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Vanity CambridgeBayWeather 01:06, 11 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as bandity. AMG has never heard of them, and nothing to suggest they meet WP:MUSIC. Friday (talk) 01:13, 11 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. NN band vanity. Cnwb 01:16, 11 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, nn, vanity. Alex.tan 04:35, 11 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as nn vanity.--Cyberjunkie | Talk 13:39, 11 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - nn vanity CLW 15:09, 11 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Just because a band exists does not mean they are notable enough to include in Wikipedia. There are many thousands of signed bands out there. Andrew pmk | Talk 23:57, 11 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - I'm with the general concencus - if a band is established, signed and reasonably popular it *may* deserve a wikipedia page. But this is an encyclopedia, not mp3.com. James Pinnell 02:29, 12 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - agree with above --DarbyAsh 09:22, 12 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete this one, but I wish the author would come back with an article on Melbourne Alternative Music, with sourcing, photos, public domain .wav files and links. Joaquin Murietta 22:44, 14 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.