Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Noir Leather
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. -- Cirt (talk) 06:07, 23 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Noir Leather (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) • Afd statistics
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable shop Kenilworth Terrace (talk) 21:42, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per Wikipedia:Potential, not just current state. Though it is presently unsourced, a moment on Google Books shows it is remarkably sourceable. —chaos5023 (talk) 04:04, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep: Its not hugely notable, but there is sourcing that can be added--probably just one of a very few shops of this type that have sufficient coverage. But its weird to see an AfD like this not garner any attention, AfD participation seems to have dipped lower lately.--Milowent • talkblp-r 02:07, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:25, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.