Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Noella Roos

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. TonyBallioni (talk) 16:12, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Noella Roos[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can't find enough substantial references about Roos to justify a GNG pass, and I don't think she meets any of the NARTIST criteria either. Checked Google, GBooks, GNews, and JSTOR and all I came up with was this book. While sort of substantial, it can't hold up the entire article on its own.

Both the Welsh and Dutch Wikipedias have articles, but no references to poach. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 12:48, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete does bot meet guidelines for notability. FloridaArmy (talk) 13:32, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Thsmi002 (talk) 00:32, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Large article is basically all OR and sources are almost all web stuff. Article seems to be PROMO. Agricola44 (talk) 13:25, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.