Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Noel C. Spencer

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JohnCD (talk) 16:26, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Noel C. Spencer[edit]

Noel C. Spencer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

County-level politician with no indication of notability per WP:POLITICIAN. Only one of the two references cited mentions him, and I can find no significant coverage of him online in WP:Reliable sources, just the passing mentions in local press that one would expect to see for a local official. I can also find nothing to verify the claimed awards won, all of which are of unclear notability. OnionRing (talk) 18:09, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. OnionRing (talk) 18:10, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Caribbean-related deletion discussions. OnionRing (talk) 18:10, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. OnionRing (talk) 18:10, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:04, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:42, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. County-level officeholders are not automatically notable per WP:NPOL — they can get Wikipedia articles if they can be sourced and substanced over WP:GNG, but this isn't well-sourced and is written very much more like a campaign brochure than an encyclopedia article. Which means nothing here is enough. Bearcat (talk) 19:09, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete county level politician who comes no where near being notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 06:15, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete political positions held do not confer notability, and I cannot find sufficient other RS material to establish notability.E.M.Gregory (talk) 23:44, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.