Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nodalotaluk

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 17:06, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nodalotaluk[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. Non-notable character whose silhouette appears in exactly one panel (on page 8) in one non-notable story. The character is mentioned at several other places in the story, but that still doesn't make her notable. I note that there is a proposal to merge the article to List of Donald Duck universe characters, but the character fails WP:IINFO in that article. Stefan2 (talk) 16:49, 25 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 17:27, 25 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:14, 26 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Less than 100 Ghits, can't find anything showing notability. Dougweller (talk) 11:50, 27 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to List of Donald Duck universe characters, which I proposed already over two weeks ago and got no objections. JIP | Talk 19:03, 27 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Where would you find reliable third-party sources to use as references in that article? Would you also add all other characters who appear in exactly one panel to that article? --Stefan2 (talk) 01:34, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:28, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete- unsourced article about a very minor fictional character. There is no sourced material to merge. Reyk _YO! 03:55, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.