Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nobama
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 04:49, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Nobama[edit]
- Nobama (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Trivial campaign neologism of no lasting importance. Borock (talk) 16:41, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - non-notable neologism WP:NEO. LinguistAtLarge • Msg 17:11, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete The one source did not even discuss the word. It just included it in a list of things McCain fans were shouting at a rally. Redddogg (talk) 20:39, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I find it hard to imagine any context in which this would be more deserving of an article than Hillary Clinton's "No way, no how, no McCain" quip, and there's no way that one would merit an article at all. Non-notable neologism whose utility is quite obviously gone for good. Bearcat (talk) 21:00, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as a non-notable neologism. It was pretty widespread on bumperstickers (saw one this morning), but I don't think it rises to the level of an encyclopedic neologism mention. It might return in 2012 and become notable, but crystal ball and all, it just isn't notable today. Jo7hs2 (talk) 21:32, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per all of the above. --User:AlbertHerring Io son l'orecchio e tu la bocca: parla! 22:28, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Neologisms must go. §FreeRangeFrog 23:10, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Non-notable, with no useful context. --Crunch (talk) 03:04, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Does not merit an article. Wasted Time R (talk) 05:08, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.