Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/No More Kings
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep. The consensus below is that sufficient sources exist to demonstrate notability. Eluchil404 (talk) 23:04, 11 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
No More Kings[edit]
- No More Kings (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
no real notability shown for this band. award is not major, just another submit your band to us for promotion thing. touring lacks coverage. lacks significant coverage in independent reliable sources. I didn' find anyting significant. nothing satisfying wp:music. original research. prod removed without comment or change. duffbeerforme (talk) 09:59, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:56, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. From a news search for "No More Kings" sweep the leg [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9]. I'm not sure how reliable some of them are (in particular, the way the starpulse.com article praises the band's nothing-out-of-the-ordinary-website made all my good faith go AWOL), but overall coverage is solid, and that together with casual mentions such as this one [10] make me think that they have in fact become a notable band by now — frankie (talk) 21:29, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Coverage in the sources provided by frankie, along with others such as these [11][12], is sufficient for subject to meet WP:GNG and criterion 1 of WP:BAND. Gongshow Talk 21:55, 11 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.