Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nnamdi Chife

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:22, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nnamdi Chife[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG or WP:NPOL. Current sources do not count towards GNG and a BEFORE makes no difference. Wikipedia is not a soapbox, or a vehicle for advertising and showcasing. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 22:00, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Businesspeople, Politicians, and Nigeria. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 22:00, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nomination. BottleOfChocolateMilk (talk) 02:36, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete since subject fails WP:GNG. Yet another text that's well put together but gets posted up here for all the wrong reasons, vanity and promotion. The plethora of citations is meant to impress though it's full of irrelevancies. -The Gnome (talk) 11:50, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – Lack of SIGCOV. The article in The Nation is arguably okay, but much of it is based on an interview. Article in Naira Metrics is almost plainly an interview, failing independence. TLA^tlak 04:32, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Nothing stated in the article is "inherently" notable enough to guarantee inclusion in Wikipedia — the notability test for politicians is holding a notable office, not just running for one and losing, and on and so forth — but the referencing is based almost entirely on Q&A interviews in which he's talking about himself in the first person and glancing namechecks of his existence in coverage about other things, not substantive WP:GNG-worthy coverage about him. Bearcat (talk) 14:16, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: There are WP: LOTSOFSOURCES. None can't relatively talk about the subject. Clearly fails WP: SNG, WP: NPOL.. All the Best! Otuọcha (talk) 07:47, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom --Devoke water 21:46, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.