Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nnaemeka Clinton

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 13:30, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nnaemeka Clinton[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Every source included in the article is a passing reference and falls far short of the requirements to meet GNG. Thilsebatti (talk) 06:56, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Nigeria. Thilsebatti (talk) 06:56, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2023 July 24. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 10:54, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete PR bizcruft is all I find. Nothing for sourcing we can use, PROMO is likely. Oaktree b (talk) 14:17, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Non-notable. No WP:SIGCOV. Uhooep (talk) 12:11, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Just noting for the record that this page was "moved" by Rusty Soto from the draft space via copy/paste (diff). While I have no opinion on the page itself (as I have not looked back) re-draftification may be more appropriate given the unilateral non-AFC manner in which this was moved to the Article space. Primefac (talk) 13:05, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.