Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nissan Terrano

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. postdlf (talk) 17:11, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nissan Terrano[edit]

Nissan Terrano (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

While this model of vehicle exists, it doesn't seem notable. There is coverage like this and this but I don't see WP:GNG. Most of this content exists at Nissan Pathfinder but one editor insists on hijacking the redirect. Chris Troutman (talk) 00:52, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Chris Troutman (talk) 00:54, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Chris Troutman (talk) 00:54, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. Chris Troutman (talk) 00:54, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • If reliable sources have these as being the same exact vehicle known under different names in different parts of the world, I would say merge because it would be silliness to have two articles for the same thing, but otherwise, I'd go with keep per WP:PRODUCT because Nissan's article would get way too big if we put the information for all of their products on the company article, and if the vehicles are not the same, we shouldn't redirect to something loosely related either. PCHS-NJROTC (Messages)Have a blessed day. 01:51, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • I was gonna say "Merge", but seeing that the name was used on different cars, I say we keep the article, but re-edit it as a vehicle disambiguation article like Kia Pride and Mazda Familia Van. - Areaseven (talk) 04:06, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 08:18, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 16:02, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep While I declined the draft of the extra Nissan Terrano page, I support keeping this particular page. This model seems different to the Pathfinder (with its use of the Dacia Duster platform) and while it's an WP:OSE cop-out, we do have a history of creating separate articles for vehicles specifically for the European/MENA/North American/Asian market. I think the problem is more with the editor that Chris troutman mentions. While we should still AGF, editors have to realize that they do not hold dominion over content they add to WP. Bkissin (talk) 20:48, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge - This needs to be merged into the Dacia Duster article. It is a rebadged version of this vehicle. Skirts89 (talk) 23:07, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep: This is a notable article on a popular vehicle. It should therefore be kept on Wikipedia. Carajou (talk) 03:22, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.