Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nisha JamVwal (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Procedural close. Deleted on 11:36, 2 December 2014 by Anthony Appleyard (G4). Natg 19 (talk) 00:34, 3 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nisha JamVwal

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I'm really not sure we should be hanging on to this article. I declined a CSD tag on it recently, mainly due to coverage in The Hindu, but the sources all seem to be passing mentions, YouTube videos or interviews. I think it's worth having a community discussion over whether this person genuinely meets the notability requirements, hence I'm bringing it here.

Note that the article was previously deleted after an AFD discussion; the recreated version has similar text but new sources, and so merits a review rather than deletion under G4. Yunshui ^雲 _水 12:22, 27 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:43, 27 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:44, 27 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:44, 27 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:44, 27 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:44, 27 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:45, 27 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I was the nominator of the previous AfD. The subject still doesn't pass our notability threshold. I can only see passing mentions and nothing else. It appears the same SPA editor has recreated the article under another username. Almost all the content of the previous one are same. No significant improvement found. All the awards seem to be very minor and the claim of Jeffrey Archer seems dubious. Sources are poor and I can't find any significant coverage. Fails notability. Jim Carter (from public cyber) 07:57, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

G4 still applies. Jim Carter (from public cyber) 07:59, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No reliable non-trivial coverage that I can find. Vanamonde93 (talk) 11:03, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Does not meet notability. StewdioMACK (talk) 04:12, 2 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as non-notable. — Jeff G. ツ (talk) 09:42, 2 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.