Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nintendo DS Lite

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. I'm nipping this in the bud. Multiple bad AFDs opened in rapid succession by a just unblocked editor. None of these are going to result in a delete or merge. -- ferret (talk) 13:49, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nintendo DS Lite[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per similar rationale to this: [1] Grandmaster Huon (talk) 03:27, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Video games and Products. Kpg jhp jm 06:08, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep. The nominator has not made an argument for deleting this article, and links to a different nomination. What they say there suggests that they're attempting to open a merge request (mistakenly doing so at AfD), saying in their nomination that they suggest merging with Game Boy Advance. Apart from that, the idea that "few would care about" a topic is very much not an admissible argument at AfD. jp×g 08:42, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep clearly meets GNG —siro χ o 09:26, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Obviously notable, and not even bothering to type a separate rationale for one of the most major selling handhelds ever is not a good look. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 10:19, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.