Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nine Attempts to Clone a Poem

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Jason Nelson. Clear consensus not to keep, redirecting as an WP:ATD. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 04:05, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nine Attempts to Clone a Poem[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about a "digital text", not referenced to any evidence of reliable source coverage about it to establish its notability as a work of literature. This has, further, been tagged as unreferenced since 2010. Bearcat (talk) 03:23, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 03:23, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. ミラ P 04:36, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. ミラ P 04:36, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Oklahoma-related deletion discussions. ミラ P 04:36, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. This article has no sources, and it never has had any since it was created. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 04:56, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. as per nom. Teraplane (talk) 21:46, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.