Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nina-Gai Till

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 07:12, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nina-Gai Till[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article's creator, a SPA, has had a week to work on this and has not managed to add anything that substantiates notability. The novel is self-published and attracts no notability; any notability rests entirely on the publication of a single short story in a volume from a small press that has apparently garnered no attention from any reliable sources (either the story or the volume). Ubelowme _U ^Me 23:17, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

delete Vanity page. Andy Dingley (talk) 23:39, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This person doesn't come close to meeting WP:AUTHOR. Not by a country mile. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 03:43, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I can find no coverage about the author in reliable sources, nor for the novel either. -- Whpq (talk) 13:58, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:36, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:36, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - does not meet WP:AUTHOR criteria. MaNeMeBasat (talk) 10:26, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Wow. This is an excellent example of a person who utterly fails WP:AUTHOR, WP:BK, and WP:BIO in every possible way. Qworty (talk) 22:52, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.