Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nils Petter Andersen

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Fenix down (talk) 08:24, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nils Petter Andersen

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Technically meets WP:FOOTY after making a single appearance in an alleged 'fully professional league' eight years ago. Has played the rest of his career in the part-time ranks. No evidence of any WP:GNG-level coverage. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 14:59, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 15:05, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 15:05, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Norway-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 15:05, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 15:06, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - there is longstanding consensus that scraping by on NFOOTBALL with one appearance is insufficient when GNG is failed so comprehensively. If sources are found which demonstrate GNG then please ping me. Giant Snowman 19:32, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete a non-notable footballer.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:21, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - have you even looked at the article cited? One more in-depth article like that is exactly the kind of coverage that is needed to pass GNG, which trumps NFOOTY. Yes, I know WP:MUSTBESOURCES is not an argument, but considering the amount of deletion discussion made by the same user on a rather small subject (Norwegian football) in the short time-period, I think we should give this article the benefit of the doubt. Mentoz (talk) 03:28, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Looks like some coverage and no clear consensus, no harm in another week but currently seeing a maximum of two potentially significant instances of coverage.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Fenix down (talk) 18:20, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete A player who has made just one top-tier appearance and has never been called up by his country internationally. No reason to keep. REDMAN 2019 (talk) 19:03, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete - the best two sources on him, that I could dig up, were both routine. There is a brief story about an injury in Grimstad Adressetidende and a story about him hoping for a new contract in Dalane Tidende; both of these are local papers covering relatively small areas Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:10, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.