Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nikola Teofilovic

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:08, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nikola Teofilovic[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:BLP of a tech entrepreneur, which makes no particularly compelling claim of notability — it's really a prosified version of a résumé, if it's anything at all. Being CEO of a tech startup can get a person into Wikipedia, if the article is sourced well enough to pass WP:GNG, but it doesn't confer an automatic inclusion freebie just because they exist. For sourcing, we have two blog pieces, and while I'm not fluent in Swedish, there are several telltale clues — same author, same date, same overall article structures, the obvious and recognizable correspondence of words like "telekombranschen" → "telecom business" and "Facebook" → "Facebook" — that the two pieces are actually the same article in English and Swedish versions. So really we've got one source — and one source, especially when it's a blog, isn't enough to pass GNG. And for added bonus, compare the creator's username ("Timtip") to the name of the topic's company ("Twintip") — insert conflict of interest here. All of which spells delete. Or radera, for the Swedish speakers among us. Bearcat (talk) 09:26, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. sst✈^(discuss) 12:22, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. sst✈^(discuss) 12:22, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as searches clearly found nothing better at all. SwisterTwister talk 22:04, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger _{One ping only} 07:13, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: non-notable investor; fails GNG. Quis separabit? 07:22, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.