Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Niko Defence League

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. TonyBallioni (talk) 16:32, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Niko Defence League[edit]

Niko Defence League (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

With coverage limited to tabloids and YouTube, I'd argue that WP:GNG is not met. signed, Rosguill talk 08:06, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 09:34, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 09:34, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 09:34, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jovanmilic97 (talk) 09:47, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Okay, Niko has had his little joke. It got a a lot of laughs, it got a lot of Youtube views, but it fails WP:SIGCOV. DELETEE.M.Gregory (talk) 11:29, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.