Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Niko (Playgirl)
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. seicer | talk | contribs 04:13, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Niko (Playgirl)[edit]
- Niko (Playgirl) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Blatant self-promotion by a porno actor. Is he notable? — RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 04:02, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- DELETE with haste Self promotion? An article about Niko (Playgirl) written by User:Niko (Playgirl)? Seems likely. My first search puts into question his notability assertion of being named "Playgirl as its 2007 Man of the Year", as NewswireToday says that honor went to Julian Fantechi. His first source simply refers to him as a Romanian striper. His second source is a pornographic blog about himself. His third third source is a movie review of Addicted to Niko. His fourth source is a Youtube clip of him stripping. His fifth source is a link to Playgirl TV. His sixth source is a link to Wicked Pictures. His only claim to notability, as the Playgirl 2007 Man of the Year, is false. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 04:40, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete--good detective work by MQS. This is all vanity--especially since he seems to have photoshopped his mug onto MY body. Drmies (talk) 05:05, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Harumphhhh... and here I though he had found an picture of MY body when 22 to use. Or is it that you and I are that much alike physically? Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 22:15, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong delete — obvious COI as well as WP:VANITY with a subtle attempt at spamming. Wish I could say there is a CSD criteria for this one, but there isn't. MuZemike (talk) 09:00, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Just spam vanity conflict of interest etc etc. JBsupreme (talk) 10:02, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, would pass WP:PORNBIO with the Playgirl award, but if that is false then no notability whatsoever. Pure vanity piece. Blackmetalbaz (talk) 13:49, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Put on your clothes, Niko, and get outta here Shameless self-promotion of a non-notable "entertainer." Ecoleetage (talk) 22:31, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Seems like a self promotion. --Banime (talk) 23:41, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.