Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nikkiey Chawla

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete by User:Jimfbleak as G7, one author who has requested deletion or blanked the page. (non-admin closure) Quasi human | Talk 12:25, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nikkiey Chawla

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I will start off by saying that the subject MIGHT be notable, possibly. However, this autobiography is totally unencyclopedic and unacceptable. Much of it consists of rants by the subject on her own past. The rest is unsourced personal anecdotes. The article is entirely unsourced. Nothing worth salvaging. Delete this mess and start over if this person is truly notable. Safiel (talk) 05:11, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete A few stuff on the interwebs but nothing as i can see to be notable, so delete this mess. King Curtis Gooden (talk) 05:43, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Author just blanked the page, so I placed a CSD G7. Safiel (talk) 06:38, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.