Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nikki Neals

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete --JForget 00:07, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nikki Neals

I believe it is possible to question the notability of Ms. Neals' contributions to the cinema. Ecoleetage (talk) 01:27, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:PORNBIO. Not assertion of notability, no citations. Happyme22 (talk) 03:19, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and actresses-related deletion discussions. -- Xymmax ^{So let it be written} _{So let it be done} 09:56, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as above and for following; Two lines of text that are source-free, don't assert notability and could have been written about any poor impressionable starlet... hence the reason we have WP:PORNBIO (which she undoubtedly fails). OBM | ^{blah blah blah} 11:56, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. Tabercil (talk) 12:24, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:PORNBIO. Notability not asserted and no evidence found in search. Even the film count in the article appears to be inflated. • Gene93k (talk) 15:28, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Strong delete Per nom, and above! T^heDJA^tC^lubR^ock :-) ^(T/C) 19:40, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Strong delete as per all of the above Greg Jones II 00:15, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not notable.Myheartinchile (talk) —Preceding comment was added at 03:58, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.