Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nikki Jackson (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. --MelanieN (talk) 23:08, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nikki Jackson

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BIO. Little depth of coverage in reliable sources. A few routine bios following her appointment, but little else. Fails WP:ANYBIO. Appears to have made no widely recognized contribution that is part of the enduring historical record. Magnolia677 (talk) 23:18, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 23:44, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Non notable person.--Human3015^TALK 00:08, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: We're not WP:LINKEDIN.--Milowent • ^hasspoken 03:50, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as there's simply nothing to suggest obvious improvement and FWIW the first AfD was for a pornography Nikki Jackson, not this one. SwisterTwister talk 05:07, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Missouri-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 05:07, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, ordinary person doing their job.TheLongTone (talk) 14:36, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as no different from anyone else doing a normal job!, Clearly a LINKEDIN-type article!. –Davey2010^Talk 23:48, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Does not meet anything. CSD nomination would have saved time for several editors. Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 18:39, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.