Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nikita Dudo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 13:00, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nikita Dudo[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Played 32 mins of professional football but has spent the majority of his career as an amateur/semi-pro in the third tier of Belarusian football. After much searching in Russian and Belarusian, I have not found any clear evidence of WP:GNG or WP:SPORTBASIC. I found Ostrovets and Football.by, both of which mention him once only. This Tribuna article used on the Belarusian Wikipedia article is just a brief loan announcement with no depth. FCO is not significant coverage and the source is not independent either, as he was employed by the club at the time. SPORTBASIC also says that team sites are generally not regarded as independent of the subject and winning an award based on a fan poll would never meet WP:ANYBIO. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:29, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Belarus. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:29, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:32, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, lacks significant coverage. --Mvqr (talk) 11:40, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. Giant Snowman 19:22, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.