Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nikhil Anand

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:32, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nikhil Anand[edit]

Nikhil Anand (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Apparently non-notable. Sources in the article are mostly cruft, press-releases (e.g., on the now-closed HuffPost blog site) etc. I found one brief mention in The Times of India. I know nothing at all about the beauty-pageant business, but I find it improbable in the extreme that this young person has acquired Miss Earth and Miss International; presumably he has the local franchise for those companies. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 11:13, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 12:26, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 12:26, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Fails WP:GNG. Since its creation it seems to have gone through different iterations. The 8th reference seems to be WP:USERGENERATED - though I might be missing something. MarnetteD|Talk 17:06, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Fails WP:GNG. I nominated the article via WP:PROD on January 7, 2018 and was deleted. Shortly after the article was deleted, it was recreated with additional sources from Huff Post and Daily Mail. However, both sources contained promotional materials, both with the same contents which were published on the same date. Richie Campbell (talk) 04:10, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.