Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nightmare Mudlib

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to George Reese (computer programmer). ☺ · Salvidrim! · ✉ 18:30, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nightmare Mudlib

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fancruft. Mr. Guye (talk) 09:49, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 01:09, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:09, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to George Reese (computer programmer). Article topic lacks significant coverage from reliable, independent sources. (?) It did not have any meaningful hits in a video game reliable sources search. George Reese (computer programmer) is a worthwhile redirect target, as the mudlib's creator, but I haven't looked into the creator's own notability. Many of the mudlibs mentioned in the navbox look to be of questionable notability. Please ping me if more (non-English and offline) sources show in the future, or if other mudlibs come to AfD in the future. czar ♔ 16:40, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:40, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to George Reese (computer programmer). I'm not seeing in depth RS to support notability, but the software is verifiable and Czar's suggested redirect is a good one. This topic has nothing to do with fancruft. --Mark viking (talk) 05:26, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.