Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nigel Tomm
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Sjakkalle (Check!) 07:44, 24 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Vanity article on a non-notable person (WP:BIO); see also the AfD on his book. Contested PROD, what else. Sandstein 10:18, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, completely un-notable. Jude (talk,contribs,email) 12:17, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, completely un-notable.Paul B 12:20, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, "un-notable"??? Have you understand the meaning of the word "un-notable" in our wiki-times? new1new2 18:13, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - how about not notable? --Khoikhoi 22:40, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, just because you don't know who he is doesn't mean he ain't notable. Mostly Rainy 00:49, 19 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Henning Makholm 04:40, 19 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above --Masssiveego 08:36, 19 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete 204 google hits, many wikipedia mirrors and others are similar open editing sites. JoshuaZ 01:55, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. ¡Dustimagic! (T/C) 05:26, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Not notable. Nigelthefish 14:45, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, it is not about "google hits" or "wikipedia mirrors", it is about Real person in a Real world. Or maybe all the knowledge of notability comes from the net? algyjaft 16:45, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I suggest that everyone (and the closing admin) review the history of this AfD since there seems to be some very odd attempts at sockpuppeting going on. JoshuaZ 15:02, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.