Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nigel Hollis

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Sandstein 19:34, 1 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nigel Hollis[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Published a book and has a blog - so what? Fails WP:GNG. Run-of-the-mill businessman. Promotional article, created by a WP:SPA. Edwardx (talk) 20:18, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:21, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Satisfies PROF with several highly cited papers (100+ cites) having 681, 360, 158, 83, 70, 41 and so on cites [1]. Book review of The Global Brand: [2]. Coverage in The Irish Times: [3]. Other coverage: [4]. There are more than nine hundred library holdings of his books: [5]. James500 (talk) 23:15, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 21:01, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:36, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep has high cite level, passes WP:PROF, also many library holdings, regards Atlantic306 (talk) 18:56, 1 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.