Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nifong Party
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sr13 is almost Singularity 07:26, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable term. No assertion of notability. Internet search reveals no reliable sources Chunky Rice 22:18, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete Seems to be racist as well. -- Gravitan(Talk | Contribs) 22:37, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete - I found this [1] editorial, but no other references to the term. Appears to be a POV pushing article at this point, unless the terminology gains more widespread coverage/usage. Douglasmtaylor T/C 22:39, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete; hoaxy goodness, and point pushing. — Coren (talk) 22:40, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom Bigdaddy1981 22:41, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletions. -- the wub "?!" 23:18, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete for notability, and general hate-filled point making. Pharmboy 00:35, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete for aggressive attack. I'd previously flagged one of her articles for the same thing, Race Bait Party, to refer to the democrat party. Seems like the user's motive is to push a POV, and this should go the way of the other and be deleted. Benea 01:30, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete POV, unsourced. Acroterion (talk) 02:07, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Suggest adding race baiting to this deletion - wikipedia isn't a dictionary and that's all that this article is fit for. Bigdaddy1981 04:38, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- While I wouldn't object to its deletion, the issues are dissimilar enough that I don't think a joint nomination would make sense. Plus, this one is already underway. -Chunky Rice 05:22, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I suppose you are right, perhaps i'll prod that one when I've a minute. Bigdaddy1981 06:28, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Tellingly, the article says it is a term for the Democrat Party, rather than the Democratic Party (an incorrect construction that Republicans use deliberately because they think it annoys Democrats). --Dhartung | Talk 10:14, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I am not sure if using a GOP stereotype in the reasoning is helpful to the conversation. Pharmboy 15:06, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- It certainly is telling of POV, though. — Coren (talk) 15:56, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I am not sure if using a GOP stereotype in the reasoning is helpful to the conversation. Pharmboy 15:06, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.