Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nicole Fuentes

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. T. Canens (talk) 10:01, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nicole Fuentes[edit]

Nicole Fuentes (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I'm having an extremely hard time trying to find good sources for this lady. Can only find this, which is no claim to notability. Every other link on this page is a dead one, and I do not believe that this person is notable. I checked more Swedish sources as well, and couldn't find too much. !dave 10:43, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Copied from talk page -- !dave

Please delete Nikkita nicks (talk) 10:50, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not real Nikkita nicks (talk) 10:51, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete - doesn't meet WP:GNG or WP:MUSICBIO. The article is rife with the kind of puffery that usually means that there is no notability there. According to the Swedish WP article her claim to notability is a 16th position in a major music competition, and that doesn't make her notable at English WP. (That article is in pretty poor shape as well, with lots of unsourced fluff and no good sources, so no help there.) I can't find any reliable and/or secondary sources after a good-faith WP:BEFORE search. --bonadea contributions talk 13:23, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - no reliable sources are presented to support notability.--Rpclod (talk) 14:01, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Babymissfortune 14:41, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Babymissfortune 14:41, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Babymissfortune 14:41, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. Babymissfortune 14:41, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment She goes (went?) by the sobriquet "The Nicole", but that search string yields exactly two additional search hits that are about her: one brief notice from a tabloid about her being taken to hospital just before the music competition mentioned above, and one transcript of a chat session from just after the contest. Enough to show she exists, but not to show notability. --bonadea contributions talk 16:40, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - Article is quite a mess, but AfD is not a clean-up service. She has participated in Melodifestivalen which is the biggest music competition in Sweden and Swedish TV. Has had music singles in Sweden and Russia. Music singles has charted. I think the users above are !voting on article quality rather than notability. Per WP:GNG. BabbaQ (talk) 12:06, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
BabbaQ, it is entirely inappropriate for you to put words in others' mouths. You are incorrect in your assessment of why I !voted. My !vote reflects that the subject is not notable and the article should be deleted.--Rpclod (talk) 12:22, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete -- a BLP that lacks sources that discuss the subject directly and in detail. BLPs should not be accepted without proper sourcing; pls see WP:NOPAGE. K.e.coffman (talk) 06:02, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Agree no RS means NOPAGE. Agricola44 (talk) 13:24, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.