Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nicole Blaszczyk

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 23:41, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nicole Blaszczyk[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Blaszczyk only ever received true attention for winning the Miss Michigan title in 2009. Being Miss Michigan is not by itself enough to make one notable. This is at the very most positive interpretation one event notability. I searched for more information. That is how I learned she now uses the last name Stoll, her married name, I was able to find a wedding registry for Nicole Blaszczyk and Andrew Stoll, but not a reliable source. She is still working as Assistant Athletics Director for Marketing and Promotions at Wayne State University. I am an alumni of Wayne State University, but that university has a very marginal athletic department. It is not division 1, so I doubt even the athletic director would be notable. Even at Michigan State I doubt a holder of Stoll's position would be notable. Beyond that, the only sourcing on her assistant athletic director position is from Wayne State press relasease and web sites. Her film roles are extremly minor, the one film she was in, Up in the Air, in 2009, that I was able to find much on, she is not one of the 58 top listed actors in the film. She has an uncredited role as a stewardess. Being Miss Michigan alone is not enough to justify an article, and that is all we have.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:11, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Michigan-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 04:26, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Beauty pageants-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 04:26, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:13, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- no inherent notability in an state-level pageant win; nothing stands out about this subject either. K.e.coffman (talk) 23:12, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. SST flyer 12:10, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.