Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nicolas Sadirac
Appearance
This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2019 October 25. For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review. |
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. North America1000 03:55, 5 October 2019 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Nicolas Sadirac (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
8.Articles whose subjects fail to meet the relevant notability guideline (WP:N, WP:GNG, WP:BIO, WP:MUSIC, WP:CORP, and so forth.
For information : This article has already been removed from Wikipedia fr for this reason. EulerObama (talk) 12:47, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 12:49, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 12:49, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, RL0919 (talk) 00:50, 28 September 2019 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, RL0919 (talk) 00:50, 28 September 2019 (UTC)
- Delete The only noteworthy event was the hacking of the Prime Minister’s website, but that’s not enough on its own for notability. Mccapra (talk) 03:12, 28 September 2019 (UTC)
- Delete . Notable, no. There are other sources out there but none that support the content of the article. Their medias are also not sufficiently established to be considered RS, even if the claims are accurate. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 05:46, 28 September 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.