Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nicolas Ruston (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Nakon 00:25, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nicolas Ruston[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Last AfD closed as no consensus with one keep and one delete vote - tpo few comments for a consensus. I'm hoping this time we can change that, especially as this has been tagged for notability for 7 years. Pinging those who have been involved in discussing his notability before: Vrac, Bearian, Slp1. Boleyn (talk) 11:18, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:21, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:21, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:21, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep and copy edit – Meets WP:BASIC. Source examples include:

Fritzl art 'not for shock value'. BBC News.
The Neo-Modern Myth. Aesthetica.
Alumnus Artist Makes his Mark on European Art Prize. The Gateway Extra. De Montfort University. pp. 6-7.

– NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:30, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 02:58, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Keep He's covered in a significant and non-trivial manner by multiple reliable secondary sources, as shown by NorthAmerica. WP:GNG — Preceding unsigned comment added by Paperpencils (talk • contribs) 08:48, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:05, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.