Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nicola Tappenden (4th nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 17:05, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nicola Tappenden

Non-notable person. This is the second time I've nominated this article in less than a week; last time, I suggested that it be protected from recreation, but instead someone ignored the open AfD and speedily deleted it without protecting it from recreation. As a result, it's back.

History:

I propose we Delete and Protect the article (but, if possible, keep the Talk page; it outlines the fact that the article has been deleted several times before, and that should be where any request for unprotection should be made). Maybe it'll happen this time... I'd be happy if it was speedily deleted (as it is a recreation of a deleted article, it can be), as long as it is protected from recreation; if that doesn't happen, I have no doubt that I'll be submitting 5th, 6th, and 7th nominations (at this rate, by the end of the month). EVula 17:26, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and Protect as per nom. Dlyons493 Talk 21:00, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and Protect per nom. Valrith 21:02, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete and protect per nom. Yomangani ^talk 23:14, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per norm. Marwatt 18:02, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete and Protect per nom. --Satori Son 21:08, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete and protect. Why are we having this discussion? — CharlotteWebb 15:03, 9 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and protect per nom. TGreenburg

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.