Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nicola Ann Raphael
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. never filed properly SarekOfVulcan (talk) 15:24, 12 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Nicola Ann Raphael[edit]
- Nicola Ann Raphael (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
WP:BIO1E Trustareas12 (talk) 21:16, 26 May 2011 (UTC) opinion based, factually restricted, people only known for one thing. i can elaborate if you wish.[reply]
Keep Notable for more than just the one event. Also notable in the context of the seperate organ donation campaign and the anti-bullying campaign and website set up. Plenty of different tv and newspaper sources for facts. Citations are used throughout for the opinions noted or quoted.Nirame (talk) 22:16, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Just as notable as all the other american bullycide victims and useful as its a UK case 80.229.122.122 (talk) 16:34, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as per Nirame--Penbat (talk) 18:25, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I note that the timing of this nomination is around the tenth anniversary and the sources in the article note that the grave and other things to do with the girl are vandalised around the anniversaries. I notice that the only wikipedia activity of the nominator has been to try and get the article deleted. Nirame (talk) 21:28, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. I think the coverage is there to support an article on this subject; it does bump up against BLP1E, but the focus of the article on the suicide itself and not the victim (?) avoids the issue. UltraExactZZ Said ~ Did 15:27, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Needs tidying but there is a lot of coverage many years later to show it has lasting impact.Also i thought these things only usually went on for 7 days?RafikiSykes (talk) 13:40, 12 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.